Jump to content

Talk:France

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeFrance was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 3, 2020Good article nomineeNot listed
In the newsA news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on September 19, 2012.

International borders

[edit]

France also shares a border with the Netherlands on the island of Saint Martin / Sint Maarten. Saint Martin is part of France, and Sint Maarten is part of the Netherlands. [12 April 2025]

International organizations

[edit]

Add in the intro that it is among the funding members of the Council of Europe, first European international organization (since 1949) Hitiste2023 (talk) 06:02, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Germany#International organizations/Paneuropeism Moxy🍁 06:08, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

why isn't "(french)" appearing anymore near "République française"

[edit]

all is said in the title 94.140.177.7 (talk) 19:30, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Someone changed the template to a simpler one. Probably because another statement of the official/primary language is redundant, and wastes more space and reader attention. Remsense ‥  20:41, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In the meantime, it doesn't say anywhere that it's in French... 94.140.177.7 (talk) 22:03, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It states below, along with corroborating evidence throughout the article, that the official language of the country is French. It is difficult for me to imagine coming away with any other idea of what language the native name is in. To me, it is not meaningfully unclear, deceptive, or coy about anything, merely less cluttered and more efficient. Remsense ‥  22:07, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 March 2025

[edit]

There is a . inside the redirecting link in two places on this page. They should be moved outside the brackets and therefore redirection for consistency. "Some examples of the most valuable French companies include LVMH, L'Oréal and Sociéte Générale." In 'Sociéte Générale.', the dot should be moved outside of the x brackets. It is also present in the line 'many foreign Roma are expelled back to Bulgaria and Romania frequently.' This is mostly cosmetic but noticeable. AT.folf (talk) 09:59, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Mathglot (talk) 10:28, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Hello, Largoplazo wishes to remove any mention of homosexuality in the legal system section in all country articles

I do not agree with this new policy laid out by him

May I have your views on the issue ?

Regards Varoon2542 (talk) 17:28, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Varoon2542 is lying. I absolutely do not want that. And Varoon needs to stop acting out and falsely imputing attitudes to me that I don't have. Largoplazo (talk) 18:24, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit history of Mauritius says otherwise
Can you please explain why you want to remove any mention of homosexuality from all country articles ?
I'll let other contributors express their views on the subject given its wide ranging consequences on nearly two hundred articles Varoon2542 (talk) 18:31, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can you explain why you're asking me why I want to do something that I don't want to do? Can you ... you know what? I'm not engaging you in your manufactured attempt at vilification here. Enjoy the discussion at WP:ANI. Largoplazo (talk) 19:03, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So I see there's a tiny dispute here.... about the addition of a sentence. I do not see the removal of other information regarding this topic. We do have an expectation of Wikipedia:Honesty. Best follow WP:FOC..... thus you should be discussing the merits of the inclusion of material that has been disputed.... as in how does it educate and is relevant for our readers etc. Moxy🍁 19:06, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.